Terror works when it instills fear (from Latin terrere ‘frighten’), and when something works there will be more and more of it.
Therefore, the reaction to terror is its fuel and its medium of proliferation.
The chance of getting killed in a terrorist attack in Europe today is 70 times lower than dying in a traffic accident, 100 times lower than contracting HIV, 5 times lower than dying in a fire, and almost the same as getting struck by a lightning.
In this context, a terrorist attack is an atrocious, horrible, pointless
with a very low probability rate (that of a lightning).
This probability rate will increase if the reaction ensues and even more so if this reaction is that of closing borders, shock, anger, increased xenophobia and reduced civil liberty under the pretext of “security”. That includes the mass-media social network hysteria (“I’m safe”, “WTF”, “I want to scream”), hypocritical references to the importance of human life (how many people are killed outside of the EU on a daily basis without any reaction?), and sudden calls to unite against the external enemy under the star-circle of Europe, stronger borders, and increased surveillance that makes the streets look like airport security zones.
There are other fights to fight (in every sense) and if one is to fight against terror, the first step is not to make the news of the day.
Treating it as a lightening strike. Pointless accident. Terror should be as good in instilling fear and hatred as lightning.
To be secure, is from Latin securus, to be ‘free from care’.
And there one may choose to make further steps and to address other conditions that make terror possible, but the scope of this action surely lies outside of the realm of writing and reading.