Polysingularity manifests itself through a dialogue. Each exchange maintains a certain center of gravity through continuous reiteration of the intention. Often, the intention is just to be polite or to stay within the common cultural or semantic field. When one wants to explore polysingularity of oneself, then the circular motion can be maintained and the momentum gained can be used to subjugate a dialogue to one’s own agenda. When one wants to explore polysingularity of a dialogue, one can pretend that nothing but the statements that are exchanged exists and so allow the differences of each iteration be in relation to each other as much as possible.
Me: Hi
Me: Hi
Me: How are you?
Me: I’m fine, thanks, and you?
Me: Me too, thanks.
Me: So, what’s going on?
Me: Not so much, and you?
Me: Well, same as always.
Me: Really?
Me: Yes.
Me: Hm.
Me: Ok.
Me: Ok?
Me: Ok…
Me: Ok!
Me: What?
Me: No, I was just thinking…
Me: Well…
Me: Well, you know…
Me: What?
Me: Uhm…
Me: Tell me…
Me: I don’t know…
Me: What are we talking about?
Me: I don’t know…
Me: Do you know who’s reading this?
Me: No, not really.
Me: But someone is reading this, right?
Me: Probably yes. Sometime. Somewhere.
Me: And so is there anything that we want to say to that person?
Me: I don’t really know. Well, yes.
Me: What?
Me: We want to say that there’s a certain circular motion in a dialogue…
Me: A sine wave…
Me: Yes… and as we go along we maintain a certain continuity.
Me: Not always.
Me: Not always.
Me: It’s not always the same. Sometimes it changes.
Me: Yes, but most of the time it stays the same.
Me: Probably, but it depends how long you stay there.
Me: What do you mean?
Me: Well, if you speak about the same thing long enough, it will take you somewhere else.
Me: How’s that?
Me: Easy. Look, you are saying that it always stays the same.
Me: Yes…
Me: And so do I. Everything always stays the same.
Me: …
Me: …
Me: …
Me: …
Me: …
Me: ?
Me: …
Me: ?
Me: …
Me: ?!
Me: …
Me: …
Me: …
Me: …
Me: …
Me: Fuck, I don’t know where I am anymore.
Me: Me too, I forgot who was saying what.
Me: It’s because when I write I can’t see who wrote what first.
Me: Yeah…
Me: That’s the thing…
Me: So there’s always this circular motion…
Me: But each time it changes a little bit…
Me: Even though it looks like it’s always the same.
Me: And so gradually it progresses towards replicating itself through repetitive iterations.
Me: Yes, and that’s how it gradually constructs its polysingularity.
Me: The intention is there where a small difference between the differences is maintained.
Me: True, but that difference in order to be true to the intention should gradually escalate.
Me: Yes, so that one moment the intention explodes.
Me: And it becomes something else.
Me: What?
Me: We want to say that there’s a certain circular motion in a dialogue…
Me: A sine wave…
Me: Yes… and as we go along we maintain a certain continuity.
Me: Not always.
Me: Not always.
Me: It’s not always the same. Sometimes it changes.
Me: Yes.
Me: Yes.
Me: Yes…
Me: Well, yes…
Me: I think that’s all I wanted to say for now.
Me: Or at least that’s all I can say.